On the Complexity of Non-monotonic Entailment in Syntax-based Approaches
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of this paper is to outline various results regarding the computational complexity of non-monotonic entailment in diierent syntax-based approaches. Starting from a (non necessarily consistent) belief base E and a pre-ordering on E, we rst remind diierent mechanisms for selecting preferred consistent subsets in syntax-based approaches. Then we present diierent entailment principles in order to manage these multiple subsets. The crossing point of each generation mechanism m and each entailment principle p deenes an entailment relation (E;)j p;m which we study from the computational complexity point of view. The obtained results are not very encouraging since the complexity of all these non-monotonic entailment relations is, even in the most restricted languages, larger than the complexity of monotonic entailment.
منابع مشابه
Non-monotonic Syntax-Based Entailment: A Classification of Consequence Relations
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative study of nonmonotonic syntax-basedconsequencerelations, from different points of view. Starting from a (not necessarily consistent) belief baseE and a pre-ordering on E, we first remind different mechanisms for selecting preferred consistent subbases in syntax-based approaches.Then, we present three entailment principles in order to cope wit...
متن کاملInconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment
The idea of ordering plays a basic role in commonsense reasoning for addressing three interrelated tasks: inconsistency handling, belief revision and plausible inference. We study the behavior of non-monotonic inferences induced by various methods for priority-based handling of inconsistent sets of classical formulas. One of them is based on a lexicographic ordering of maximal consistent subset...
متن کاملNon Monotonic Reasoning and Belief
The major approaches to belief revision and non monotonic reasoning proposed in the literature diier along a number of dimensions, including whether they are \syntax-based" or \semantic-based", \foundational" or \coherentist", \consistence{restoring" or \inconsistency{tolerant". Our contribution towards clarifying the connections between these various approaches is threefold: We show that the t...
متن کاملDefeasible Inheritance-Based Description Logics
Defeasible inheritance networks are a non-monotonic framework that deals with hierarchical knowledge. On the other hand, rational closure is acknowledged as a landmark of the preferential approach to non-monotonic reasoning. We will combine these two approaches and define a new non-monotonic closure operation for propositional knowledge bases that combines the advantages of both. Then we redefi...
متن کاملOn the Relation between Argumentation and Non-monotonic Coherence-Based Entailment
I he purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare t w o types o f methods fo r reasoning w i t h i n c o n s i s t e n t be l i e f bases coherence based approaches to non monolonic entailment based on the se lec t ion and management of consistent subbascs and argumentation systems based on the construction and selection of arguments in favor of a conc lus ion we present several argumentatio...
متن کامل